Show simple item record

AuthorHagemann, Jandc.contributor.author
AuthorRoesner, Janadc.contributor.author
AuthorHelling, Soenkedc.contributor.author
AuthorJacobi, Christiandc.contributor.author
AuthorDoescher, Johannesdc.contributor.author
AuthorEngelbarts, Matthiasdc.contributor.author
AuthorKuenzel, Juliandc.contributor.author
AuthorKrauss, Philippdc.contributor.author
AuthorBecker, Svendc.contributor.author
AuthorBetz, Christian Stephandc.contributor.author
Date of accession2023-01-23T13:19:54Zdc.date.accessioned
Available in OPARU since2023-01-23T13:19:54Zdc.date.available
Date of first publication2018-12-04dc.date.issued
AbstractObjective Endoscopic resection of sinonasal cancer has become an alternative to open craniofacial surgery and leads to safe and satisfying results in emerging numbers. Randomized study data comparing outcomes between approaches are missing. Hence, it remains unclear which subgroups of patients might profit most from each technique. We aimed to identify such patient and tumor characteristics and gather information for future prospective study design. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting Tertiary academic center. Subjects and Methods This study is based on a retrospective chart review of 225 patients undergoing open craniofacial or endoscopic resection for sinonasal malignancy between 1993 and 2015 at Munich University Hospital. Statistical analyses include t test, chi-square, Kaplan-Meier charts, and univariate and multivariate analyses. Results The sample size was similar between the endoscopic and open surgery groups. Tumors were significantly larger in patients who underwent open craniofacial resection. The risk of notable bleeding (P = .041) was lower and hospital stay shorter (P = .001) for endoscopic interventions of all tumor stages. Rates of overall (P = .024) and disease-specific (P = .036) survival were significantly improved for endoscopic cases; improved recurrence-free survival rates did not achieve statistical significance (P = .357). For cases matched for tumor size, this improvement was confirmed for T3 tumors (P = .038). Regional and distant metastatic tumor spread generally worsened survival in both surgical subgroups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed independent prognosticators for overall survival. Conclusion Endoscopic tumor resection remains a suitable option for distinct indications and showed improved outcome in intermediate-stage tumors in our collective. Further randomized studies acknowledging the here-identified factors are needed to improve future therapy guidelines and patient care.dc.description.abstract
Languageendc.language.iso
PublisherUniversität Ulmdc.publisher
LicenseCC BY-NC 4.0 Internationaldc.rights
Link to license texthttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/dc.rights.uri
Keywordsinonasal cancerdc.subject
Keywordhead and neck cancerdc.subject
Keywordendoscopic skull base surgerydc.subject
Keywordendoscopic sinus surgerydc.subject
KeywordCSF leakdc.subject
Dewey Decimal GroupDDC 610 / Medicine & healthdc.subject.ddc
MeSHHead and neck neoplasmsdc.subject.mesh
MeSHSkull base; Surgerydc.subject.mesh
MeSHParanasal sinuses; Surgerydc.subject.mesh
MeSHEndoscopydc.subject.mesh
TitleLong-term Outcome for Open and Endoscopically Resected Sinonasal Tumorsdc.title
Resource typeBeitrag zu einer Konferenzdc.type
SWORD Date2020-12-09T19:39:38Zdc.date.updated
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.18725/OPARU-46761dc.identifier.doi
URNhttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:289-oparu-46837-6dc.identifier.urn
GNDMund-Kiefer-Gesichts-Chirurgiedc.subject.gnd
GNDHals-Nasen-Ohren-Tumordc.subject.gnd
GNDMinimal-invasive Chirurgiedc.subject.gnd
GNDEndoskopiedc.subject.gnd
FacultyMedizinische Fakultätuulm.affiliationGeneral
InstitutionUKU. Klinik für Hals-, Nasen-, Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgieuulm.affiliationSpecific
DCMI TypeTextuulm.typeDCMI
CategoryPublikationenuulm.category
DOI of original publication10.1177/0194599818815881dc.relation1.doi
Source - Title of sourceOtolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgerysource.title
Source - PublisherSage CA: Los Angeles, CAsource.publisherPlace
Source - Place of publicationSAGE Publicationssource.publisher
Source - Volume160source.volume
Source - Issue5source.issue
Source - Year2019source.year
Source - From page862source.fromPage
Source - To page869source.toPage
Source - ISSN0194-5998source.identifier.issn
Source - eISSN1097-6817source.identifier.eissn
Conference name122nd Annual Meeting of the American-Academy-of-Otolaryngology-Head-and-Neck-Surgery-Foundation (AAO-HNSF) and OTO Experienceuulm.conferenceName
Conference placeChicago, ILuulm.conferencePlace
Conference start date2017-09-10uulm.conferenceStartDate
Conference end date2017-09-13uulm.conferenceEndDate
WoS000468292700013uulm.identifier.wos
Bibliographyuulmuulm.bibliographie


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record