Presurgical screening improves risk prediction for delirium in elective surgery of older patients: the PAWEL RISK study
Eschweiler, Gerhard W.
Herrmann, Matthias L.
Knauer, Yvonne P.
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience ; 13 (2021). - Art.-Nr. 679933. - eISSN 1663-4365
Link to original publicationhttps://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.679933
InstitutionsUKU. Klinik für Neurologie
Geriatrisches Zentrum Ulm/Alb-Donau
Document versionpublished version (publisher's PDF)
Introduction: The number of elective surgeries for patients who are over 70 years of age is continuously growing. At the same time, postoperative delirium (POD) is common in older patients (5–60%) depending on predisposing risk factors, such as multimorbidity, cognitive impairment, neurodegenerative disorders and other dementing disorders, and precipitating factors, such as duration of surgery. Knowledge of individual risk profiles prior to elective surgery may help to identify patients at increased risk for development of POD. In this study, clinical and cognitive risk factors for POD were investigated in patients undergoing various elective cardiac and non-cardiac surgeries. Methods: The PAWEL study is a prospective, interventional trial on delirium prevention. At baseline, 880 inpatients at five surgical centers were recruited for sub-sample PAWEL-R. Multimodal assessments included clinical renal function, medication, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System, geriatric and cognitive assessments, which comprised the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA), Trail-making Test, and Digit Span backward. Delirium incidence was monitored postoperatively by the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) and a chart review for up to a week or until discharge. Multivariate regression models and Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detectors (CHAID) analyses were performed using delirium incidence as the primary outcome. Results: Eighteen risk factors were investigated in elective cardiovascular and orthopedic or general surgery. A total of 208 out of 880 patients (24%) developed POD. A global regression model that included all risk variables predicted delirium incidence with high accuracy (AUC = 0.81; 95% CI 0.77, 0.85). A simpler model (clinical and cognitive variables; model CLIN-COG) of 10 factors that only included surgery type, multimorbidity, renal failure, polypharmacy, ASA, cut-to-suture time, and cognition (MoCA, Digit Span backward, and preexisting dementia), however, exhibited similar predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.80; 95% CI 0.76, 0.84). Conclusion: The risk of developing POD can be estimated by preoperative assessments, such as ASA classification, expected cut-to-suture time, and short cognitive screenings. This rather efficient approach predicted POD risk over all types of surgery. Thus, a basic risk assessment including a cognitive screen can help to stratify patients at low, medium, or high POD risk to provide targeted prevention and/or management strategies for patients at risk.
Is supplemented byhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnagi.2021.679933/full#supplementary-material
Subject headings[GND]: Delirium | Postoperative Phase | Alter | Risikofaktor | Risikoanalyse
[MeSH]: Delirium | Postoperative complications | Aged | Risk factors | Risk assessment
[Free subject headings]: postoperative delirium | elective surgery | cognitive assessment | cognitive impairment | risk prediction | frailty | geriatric assessments | acute encephalopathy
[DDC subject group]: DDC 610 / Medicine & health
LicenseCC BY 4.0 International
MetadataShow full item record
DOI & citation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.18725/OPARU-46144