Show simple item record

AuthorSchneider, Cyrildc.contributor.author
AuthorZangrandi, Andreadc.contributor.author
AuthorSollmann, Nicodc.contributor.author
AuthorBonfert, Michaela Veronikadc.contributor.author
AuthorBeaulieu, Louis-Daviddc.contributor.author
Date of accession2022-06-28T12:48:03Zdc.date.accessioned
Available in OPARU since2022-06-28T12:48:03Zdc.date.available
Date of first publication2022-03-22dc.date.issued
AbstractAn increasing number of clinical research studies have used repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) in recent years to alleviate pain or improve motor function. rPMS is non-invasive, painless, and administrated over peripheral nerve, spinal cord roots, or a muscle using a coil affixed to the skin and connected to a rapid-rate magnetic stimulator. Despite the clinical impact and scientific interest, the methodological inconsistencies or incomplete details and findings between studies could make the rPMS demonstration difficult to replicate. Given the lack of guidelines in rPMS literature, the present study aimed at developing a checklist to improve the quality of rPMS methods in research. An international panel of experts identified among those who had previously published on the topic were enrolled in a two-round web-based Delphi study with the aim of reaching a consensus on the items that should be reported or controlled in any rPMS study. The consensual rPMS checklist obtained comprises 8 subject-related items (e.g., age, sex), 16 methodological items (e.g., coil type, pulse duration), and 11 stimulation protocol items (e.g., paradigm of stimulation, number of pulses). This checklist will contribute to new interventional or exploratory rPMS research to guide researchers or clinicians on the methods to use to test and publish rPMS after-effects. Overall, the checklist will guide the peer-review process on the quality of rPMS methods reported in a publication. Given the dynamic nature of a consensus between international experts, it is expected that future research will affine the checklist.dc.description.abstract
Languageendc.language.iso
PublisherUniversität Ulmdc.publisher
LicenseCC BY 4.0 Internationaldc.rights
Link to license texthttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/dc.rights.uri
Keywordrepetitive peripheral magnetic stimulationdc.subject
KeywordDelphi studydc.subject
KeywordrPMS checklistdc.subject
Keywordnon-invasive neurostimulationdc.subject
Keywordperipheral neurostimulationdc.subject
Dewey Decimal GroupDDC 610 / Medicine & healthdc.subject.ddc
LCSHMagnetic brain stimulationdc.subject.lcsh
TitleChecklist on the quality of the repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) methods in research: an international delphi studydc.title
Resource typeWissenschaftlicher Artikeldc.type
SWORD Date2022-05-14T10:19:00Zdc.date.updated
VersionpublishedVersiondc.description.version
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.18725/OPARU-43546dc.identifier.doi
URNhttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:289-oparu-43622-3dc.identifier.urn
GNDNervenstimulationdc.subject.gnd
InstitutionUKU. Klinik für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologieuulm.affiliationSpecific
Peer reviewjauulm.peerReview
DCMI TypeCollectionuulm.typeDCMI
CategoryPublikationenuulm.category
DOI of original publication10.3389/fneur.2022.852848dc.relation1.doi
Source - Title of sourceFrontiers in Neurologysource.title
Source - Place of publicationFrontiers Mediasource.publisher
Source - Volume13source.volume
Source - Year2022source.year
Source - Article number852848source.articleNumber
Source - eISSN1664-2295source.identifier.eissn
Open Accessgold, Green Publisheduulm.OA
WoS000784330700001uulm.identifier.wos
Bibliographyuulmuulm.bibliographie


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record