Structural gradients and anisotropic hydraulic conductivity in the enigmatic eel traps of carnivorous corkscrew plants (Genlisea spp.)

peer-reviewed
Erstveröffentlichung
2021-12-24Authors
Carmesin, Cora F.
Fleischmann, Andreas S.
Klepsch, Matthias M.
Westermeier, Anna S.
Speck, Thomas
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Published in
American Journal of Botany ; 108 (2021), 12. - S. 2356-2370. - ISSN 0002-9122. - eISSN 1537-2197
Link to original publication
https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1779Faculties
Fakultät für NaturwissenschaftenInstitutions
Institut für Systematische Botanik und ÖkologieExternal cooperations
Botanische Staatssammlung MünchenLudwig‐Maximilians‐Universität München
Cluster of Excellence Living, Adaptive and Energy-autonomous Materials Systems (livMatS)
Botanische Garten der Universität Freiburg
Document version
published version (publisher's PDF)Abstract
Abstract
Premise
Among the sophisticated trap types in carnivorous plants, the underground eel traps of corkskrew plants (Genlisea spp., Lentibulariaceae) are probably the least understood in terms of their functional principle. Here, we provide a detailed analysis of structural and hydraulic features of G. hispidula traps, contributing to the ongoing debate on whether these traps can actively generate water streams to promote prey capture.
Methods
Anatomical and hydraulic traits of detached traps, including inner trap diameters, chamber line element, hair length, glandular pattern, and hydraulic conductivity, were investigated quantitatively using light and electron microscopy, x‐ray microtomography, and hydraulic measurements.
Results
Hydraulic resistivity in the neck of the trap, from the trap mouth toward the vesicle (digestive chamber) was 10 times lower than in the opposite direction. The comparison of measured and theoretical flow rates suggests that the retrorse hairs inside trap necks also provide considerable resistance against movement of matter toward the vesicle. Hairs showed a gradient in length along the neck, with the shortest hairs near the vesicle. Co‐occurrence of quadrifid and bifid glands was limited to a small part of the neck, with quadrifids near the vesicle and bifids toward the trap mouth.
Conclusions
The combination of structural gradients with hydraulic anisotropy suggests the trap is a highly fine‐tuned system based on likely trade‐offs between efficient prey movement in the trap interior toward the vesicle, prey retention, and spatial digestion capacities and is not counter to the generation of water streams.
Is supplemented by
https://doi.org/10.18725/OPARU-38873https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1002%2Fajb2.1779&file=ajb21779-sup-0001-Appendix_S1.pdf
https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1002%2Fajb2.1779&file=ajb21779-sup-0002-Appendix_S2.pdf
https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1002%2Fajb2.1779&file=ajb21779-sup-0003-Appendix_S3.pdf
https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1002%2Fajb2.1779&file=ajb21779-sup-0004-Appendix_S4.pdf
https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1002%2Fajb2.1779&file=ajb21779-sup-0005-Appendix_S5.pdf
https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1002%2Fajb2.1779&file=ajb21779-sup-0006-Appendix_S6.pdf
https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1002%2Fajb2.1779&file=ajb21779-sup-0007-Appendix_S7.pdf
https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1002%2Fajb2.1779&file=ajb21779-sup-0008-Appendix_S8.pdf
https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1002%2Fajb2.1779&file=ajb21779-sup-0009-appendix_s9.zip
https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1002%2Fajb2.1779&file=ajb21779-sup-0010-appendix_s10.pdf
https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1002%2Fajb2.1779&file=ajb21779-sup-0011-appendix_s11.pdf
https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1002%2Fajb2.1779&file=ajb21779-sup-0012-appendix_s12.pdf
https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1002%2Fajb2.1779&file=ajb21779-sup-0013-appendix_s13.pdf
https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1002%2Fajb2.1779&file=ajb21779-sup-0014-appendix_s14.pdf
Subject headings
[GND]: Fleischfressende Pflanzen | Wasserschlauchgewächse[LCSH]: Carnivorous plants | Soil permeability | Lentibulariaceae | Animal-plant relationships | Hydraulics
[Free subject headings]: functional morphology | hydraulic conductivity | plant-animal interaction | prey capture | prey retention | rhizophyll | trapping mechanism | water flow
[DDC subject group]: DDC 580 / Botanical sciences
License
CC BY-NC International 4.0Metadata
Show full item recordDOI & citation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.18725/OPARU-43193
Carmesin, Cora F. et al. (2022): Structural gradients and anisotropic hydraulic conductivity in the enigmatic eel traps of carnivorous corkscrew plants (Genlisea spp.). Open Access Repositorium der Universität Ulm und Technischen Hochschule Ulm. http://dx.doi.org/10.18725/OPARU-43193
Citation formatter >