Show simple item record

AuthorOlderbak, Sallydc.contributor.author
AuthorWilhelm, Oliverdc.contributor.author
Date of accession2021-12-06T07:40:56Zdc.date.accessioned
Available in OPARU since2021-12-06T07:40:56Zdc.date.available
Date of first publication2019-12-12dc.date.issued
AbstractPsychological scientists have intensively studied how people handle emotions and navigate social situations for more than a century. However, advancements in our understanding of socioemotional constructs have been hampered because of challenges in assessment. Several measurement problems have been identified; however, we want to bring attention to a potentially larger problem. Many operationalizations and measures of socioemotional constructs are poorly embedded within the larger body of psychological research, hampered by jingle and jangle fallacies. Jingle fallacies occur when assessment tools are assumed to measure the same construct but in practice measure different constructs. Jangle fallacies occur when assessment tools are assumed to measure different constructs but in practice measure the same construct. Both fallacies are primarily due to a qualitative divide between a construct’s definition and how it was measured. We discuss this issue, identify examples of jingle and jangle fallacies, and conclude with recommendations. © In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/dc.description.abstract
Languageendc.language.iso
PublisherUniversität Ulmdc.publisher
LicenseIn Copyrightdc.rights
Link to license texthttps://rightsstatements.org/en/documentation/usage_guidelines.htmldc.rights.uri
Keywordjingle fallacydc.subject
Keywordjangle fallacydc.subject
Keywordindividual differencesdc.subject
Keywordsocioemotional constructsdc.subject
Keywordmeasurementdc.subject
Keywordvalidationdc.subject
Dewey Decimal GroupDDC 150 / Psychologydc.subject.ddc
MeSHEmotionsdc.subject.mesh
MeSHEmotional intelligencedc.subject.mesh
MeSHOxytocindc.subject.mesh
TitleOverarching principles for the organization of socioemotional constructsdc.title
Resource typeWissenschaftlicher Artikeldc.type
SWORD Date2020-05-09T16:19:51Zdc.date.updated
VersionpublishedVersiondc.description.version
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.18725/OPARU-40129dc.identifier.doi
URNhttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:289-oparu-40205-0dc.identifier.urn
GNDGefühldc.subject.gnd
GNDIntelligenzdc.subject.gnd
FacultyFakultät für Ingenieurwissenschaften, Informatik und Psychologieuulm.affiliationGeneral
InstitutionInstitut für Psychologie und Pädagogikuulm.affiliationSpecific
Peer reviewjauulm.peerReview
DCMI TypeTextuulm.typeDCMI
CategoryPublikationenuulm.category
DOI of original publication10.1177/0963721419884317dc.relation1.doi
Source - Title of sourceCurrent Directions in Psychological Sciencesource.title
Source - Place of publicationSAGE Publicationssource.publisher
Source - Volume29source.volume
Source - Issue1source.issue
Source - Year2020source.year
Source - From page63source.fromPage
Source - To page70source.toPage
Source - ISSN0963-7214source.identifier.issn
Source - eISSN1467-8721source.identifier.eissn
CommunityFakultät für Ingenieurwissenschaften, Informatik und Psychologieuulm.community
WoS000502427300001uulm.identifier.wos
Rights noticeDieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.dc.rights.other
Rights noticeThis publication is with permission of the rights owner freely accessible due to an Alliance licence and a national licence (funded by the DFG, German Research Foundation) respectively.dc.rights.other
Bibliographyuulmuulm.bibliographie
DFG project uulmSozio-emotionale Fahigkeiten und Empathie bei Psychopathen / DFG / 365266458uulm.projectDFG


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record