Show simple item record

AuthorJunne, Floriandc.contributor.author
AuthorMichaelis, Martinadc.contributor.author
AuthorRothermund, Evadc.contributor.author
AuthorStuber, Felicitasdc.contributor.author
AuthorGündel, Haralddc.contributor.author
AuthorZipfel, Stephandc.contributor.author
AuthorRieger, Monikadc.contributor.author
Date of accession2021-12-06T07:01:42Zdc.date.accessioned
Available in OPARU since2021-12-06T07:01:42Zdc.date.available
Date of first publication2018-03-20dc.date.issued
AbstractObjectives: This study analyses the perceived relevance of stress-dimensions in work-settings from the differential views of Human Resource Managers (HRM), Occupational Physicians (OP), Primary Care Physicians (PCP) and Psychotherapists (PT) in Germany. Methods: Cross-sectional study design, using a self-report questionnaire. Descriptive measures and explorative bivariate methods were applied for group-comparisons. Results are presented as rankings of perceived importance and as polarity profiles of contrasting views. Results: N = 627 participants completed the questionnaires (HRM: n = 172; OP: n = 133; PCP: n = 136; PT: n = 186). The stress dimensions with the highest mean ratings across all four professions were: ‘social relationships in the work place’ (M = 3.55, SD = 0.62) and ‘superiors’ leadership style’ (M = 3.54, SD = 0.64). Mean ratings of perceived relevance of stress dimensions differed most between HRM and the three medical professions. Conclusions: The perceived importance of work-related stress-dimensions seems to be higher in the medical disciplines (OP, PCP, PT) than in the group from the management sector (HRM). However, no fundamental disagreement on the role of work-related stress-dimensions seems to hinder e.g., intensified efforts of cooperation across sectors in tackling the “stress-pandemic” and improving the (mental) health of employees.dc.description.abstract
Languageendc.language.iso
PublisherUniversität Ulmdc.publisher
LicenseCC BY 4.0 Internationaldc.rights
Link to license texthttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/dc.rights.uri
Keywordwork related stressdc.subject
Keywordprimary care physiciansdc.subject
Keywordhuman resource managersdc.subject
Dewey Decimal GroupDDC 150 / Psychologydc.subject.ddc
Dewey Decimal GroupDDC 610 / Medicine & healthdc.subject.ddc
MeSHPhysiciansdc.subject.mesh
MeSHPsychotherapistsdc.subject.mesh
MeSHHealth personneldc.subject.mesh
MeSHBurnout, Professionaldc.subject.mesh
MeSHOccupational healthdc.subject.mesh
MeSHStress, Psychologicaldc.subject.mesh
TitleThe role of work-related factors in the development of psychological distress and associated mental disorders: differential views of human resource managers, occupational physicians, primary care physicians and psychotherapists in germanydc.title
Resource typeWissenschaftlicher Artikeldc.type
SWORD Date2019-12-19T18:14:25Zdc.date.updated
VersionpublishedVersiondc.description.version
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.18725/OPARU-40123dc.identifier.doi
URNhttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:289-oparu-40199-5dc.identifier.urn
GNDArzdc.subject.gnd
GNDPsychotherapeutdc.subject.gnd
GNDStressbewältigungdc.subject.gnd
FacultyMedizinische Fakultätuulm.affiliationGeneral
InstitutionUKU. Klinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapieuulm.affiliationSpecific
Peer reviewjauulm.peerReview
DCMI TypeTextuulm.typeDCMI
CategoryPublikationenuulm.category
DOI of original publication10.3390/ijerph15030559dc.relation1.doi
Source - Title of sourceInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthsource.title
Source - Place of publicationMDPIsource.publisher
Source - Volume15source.volume
Source - Issue3source.issue
Source - Year2018source.year
Source - eISSN1660-4601source.identifier.eissn
Bibliographyuulmuulm.bibliographie


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record