• English
    • Deutsch
  • English 
    • English
    • Deutsch
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Universität Ulm / Medizin
  • Publikationen
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Universität Ulm / Medizin
  • Publikationen
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Evaluation der Blutgerinnung verschiedener Großtiermodelle und Vergleich des prokoagulatorischen Effektes der Hämostyptika QuikClot® Gauze TM, Celox TM Gauze, QuikClot ACS+ TM und H&H PriMed Compressed Gauze mit der Rotationsthromboelastometrie

Thumbnail
vts_9790_14886.pdf (937.0Kb)
111 S.
Veröffentlichung
2015-11-17
Authors
Müller, Maximilian
Dissertation


Faculties
Medizinische Fakultät
Abstract
Introduction: Haemorrhage is the leading cause of preventable death in military conflicts. Different types of haemostatic dressings have been developed and have been compared in animal studies for their ability to control bleeding. The effects of haemostatic agents in animals may be different from those in humans. It is still unclear what animal species is most similar to humans in terms of the physiology of blood coagulation. In addition, there is a paucity of data comparing the effects of different haemostatic dressings in humans. Material and methods: Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) was used to analyse coagulation in various animal species (pigs, sheep, rabbits, and dogs) and to compare it with human coagulation. In addition, ROTEM was used to examine the efficacy of different haemostatic dressings (QuikClot® Gauze TM, Celox TM Gauze and QuikClot ACS+ TM) in comparison to standard gauze in human blood. Results: All animal species showed differences in coagulation properties when compared to humans. Dogs and sheep were most similar to humans in terms of coagulation. QuikClot® Gauze TM was the most efficacious haemostatic dressing, followed by Celox TM Gauze and standard gauze. QuikClot ACS+ TM was clearly outperformed by all other dressings. Conclusion: Our results suggest that dogs and sheep should be preferred to pigs or rabbits in haemostatic research. Furthermore modern haemostatic dressings such as QuikClot® Gauze TM and Celox TM Gauze should be preferred to previous generations of haemostatic dressings such as QuikClot ACS+ TM. In-vitro studies like rotational thromboelastometry can provide valuable information about the mechanisms of action of haemostatic dressings. A combination of different mechanisms of action may increase the efficacy of haemostatic dressings.
Date created
2014
Subject headings
[GND]: Blutgerinnung | Blutstillungsmittel | Hund | Kaninchen | Mensch | Schaf | Schwein
[MeSH]: Blood coagulation | Thrombelastography
[Free subject headings]: Hämostyptika | Rotationsthromboelastometrie | ROTEM®
[DDC subject group]: DDC 610 / Medicine & health
License
Standard
https://oparu.uni-ulm.de/xmlui/license_v3

Metadata
Show full item record

DOI & citation

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.18725/OPARU-3720

Müller, Maximilian (2015): Evaluation der Blutgerinnung verschiedener Großtiermodelle und Vergleich des prokoagulatorischen Effektes der Hämostyptika QuikClot® Gauze TM, Celox TM Gauze, QuikClot ACS+ TM und H&H PriMed Compressed Gauze mit der Rotationsthromboelastometrie. Open Access Repositorium der Universität Ulm und Technischen Hochschule Ulm. Dissertation. http://dx.doi.org/10.18725/OPARU-3720
Citation formatter >



Policy | kiz service OPARU | Contact Us
Impressum | Privacy statement
 

 

Advanced Search

Browse

All of OPARUCommunities & CollectionsPersonsInstitutionsPublication typesUlm SerialsDewey Decimal ClassesEU projects UlmDFG projects UlmOther projects Ulm

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Policy | kiz service OPARU | Contact Us
Impressum | Privacy statement