Show simple item record

AuthorEberle, Pauldc.contributor.author
Date of accession2016-03-15T10:42:39Zdc.date.accessioned
Available in OPARU since2016-03-15T10:42:39Zdc.date.available
Year of creation2013dc.date.created
AbstractObjective 1. To research patients and physicians willingness of taking part in a study like the FFP (Fix-Flex-Protocol), in which DT (diagnostic testing) can be assessed on the level of therapeutic effectiveness. 2. To describe patients and physicians expectations towards diagnostic testing and MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) 3. To measure the influence of information on the willingness of taking part in the FFP. Methods Patients in hospitals in Ulm, Dresden and Berlin (Germany) and Brixen (Italy) with injury or trouble of shoulder, knee or ankle joints were randomized to one of two questionnaire versions: one version with extra information about MRI and one without. Orthopedists got the version without extra information. Results were compared by using Chi-Square-Test. Results 860 patient versions have been sent to the hospitals and 497 returned. 14 were excluded. 51 physician versions were returned. Willingness for taking part in the FFP was 70 % in the patients group and 71 % in physicians group. Extra information had no significant effect (p = 0,173). 98 % of the asked thought that physicians and nurses know patient’s needs. 95 % expressed the opinion that patients should be asked before testing. 57 % of the physicians and 96 % of the patients believe that patients should have the right to demand a diagnostic test. 43 % of the physicians and 88 % of the patients think the more DT means the better outcome. 52 % of the patients and 88 % of the physicians think that DT can lead to a wrong conclusion. 38 % of the patients and 86 % of the physicians agree to this in the case of MRI. 70 % of the patients and 98 % of the physicians think that clinical experience is more important than MRI. Conclusion High willingness of taking part shows that a clinical trial like the FFP seems to be possible. Patients and physicians differ in the assessment of diagnostic tests, MRI and clinical examination. The results generating hypotheses that seem worth researching further.dc.description.abstract
Languagededc.language.iso
PublisherUniversität Ulmdc.publisher
LicenseStandarddc.rights
Link to license texthttps://oparu.uni-ulm.de/xmlui/license_v3dc.rights.uri
KeywordClinical examinationdc.subject
KeywordDiagnostic testdc.subject
Dewey Decimal GroupDDC 610 / Medicine & healthdc.subject.ddc
MeSHDiagnosisdc.subject.mesh
MeSHMagnetic resonance imagingdc.subject.mesh
TitleNutzerbewertung von Diagnostik am Beispiel Kernspintomographie: eine Befragung von Patienten und ärztlichem Personaldc.title
Resource typeDissertationdc.type
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.18725/OPARU-3693dc.identifier.doi
PPN833229869dc.identifier.ppn
URNhttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:289-vts-97022dc.identifier.urn
GNDKernspintomografiedc.subject.gnd
GNDUntersuchung <Medizin>dc.subject.gnd
FacultyMedizinische Fakultätuulm.affiliationGeneral
Date of activation2015-08-10T10:02:50Zuulm.freischaltungVTS
Peer reviewneinuulm.peerReview
Shelfmark print versionW: W-H 14.316uulm.shelfmark
DCMI TypeTextuulm.typeDCMI
VTS ID9702uulm.vtsID
CategoryPublikationenuulm.category
Bibliographyuulmuulm.bibliographie


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record