Show simple item record

AuthorKesberg, Rebekkadc.contributor.author
Date of accession2021-04-28T06:51:14Zdc.date.accessioned
Available in OPARU since2021-04-28T06:51:14Zdc.date.available
Year of creation2020dc.date.created
Date of first publication2021-04-28dc.date.issued
AbstractPersonal values are abstract and desirable goals which serve as guidelines in peoples’ life, and are standards and criteria used to evaluate people events and actions. A unique feature of the Schwartz Model of Basic Human Values is the proposed structural composition of the model. That is the model postulates compatibilities and conflicts between ten distinct values types, which result in a circumplex model. Within this circumplex model, adjunctive values represented compatible motivations, while opposing values in the circle represent conflicting motivations. That structural composition of the value model has important consequences for the relationship between human values and outer constructs, like beliefs, behavior and situation perception. Each relationship is impacted not only by one single value, but rather by the trade-off between multiple competing values. Based on these assumptions, the relation between any outer construct and the complete value model should result in a specific pattern: a sinusoidal pattern. Therefore, to fully comprehend the role of values it is necessary to consider all values and their interrelations as an integrative system when examining their impact on other (psychological) constructs. This thesis summarizes four original articles which focus on the impact of the complete value model, that is taking the structural composition with the proposed value (in-)compatibilities into account, for the perception, evaluation and endorsement of people, events and actions. In total, the four articles summarize 13 studies with 2056 participants. The studies show that compatibilities and conflicts between values relate to the endorsement of different self-regulatory orientations, to monetary donations to different organizations, to perception of situation characteristics and to the endorsement of specific types of essentialist beliefs. In sum, the findings presented in this thesis underline the importance and the meaningfulness of considering the structural composition of the value model. Further, the thesis emphasizes the meaningfulness of connecting the Schwartz Model of Basic Human Values with other motivational theories in order to obtain a more comprehensive picture of human motivation.dc.description.abstract
Languageendc.language.iso
PublisherUniversität Ulmdc.publisher
Has partKeller, J., & Kesberg, R. (2017). Regulatory focus and human values. Psihologija, 50(2), 157- 186. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI160809004Kdc.relation.haspart
Has partKesberg, R., & Keller, J. (2018). The relation between human values and perceived situation characteristics in everyday life. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1676. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01676dc.relation.haspart
Has partKesberg, R., & Keller, J. (2021) Donating to the ‘right’ cause: Compatibility of personal values and mission statements of philanthropic organizations fosters prosocial behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110313dc.relation.haspart
Has partKesberg, R., & Keller, J. (2021) Personal values as motivational basis of psychological essentialism: An exploration of the value profile underlying essentialist beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, 110458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110458dc.relation.haspart
LicenseStandard (ohne Print-on-Demand)dc.rights
Link to license texthttps://oparu.uni-ulm.de/xmlui/license_opod_v1dc.rights.uri
Dewey Decimal GroupDDC 150 / Psychologydc.subject.ddc
LCSHValuesdc.subject.lcsh
TitleInvestigating integrative value systems: the role of value (in-) compatibilities on perception and evaluation of people, events, and actionsdc.title
Resource typeDissertationdc.type
Date of acceptance2021-02-05dcterms.dateAccepted
RefereeKeller, Johannesdc.contributor.referee
RefereePfattheicher, Stefandc.contributor.referee
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.18725/OPARU-36790dc.identifier.doi
PPN1756561117dc.identifier.ppn
URNhttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:289-oparu-36852-3dc.identifier.urn
GNDWertorientierungdc.subject.gnd
GNDMotivationdc.subject.gnd
GNDWertordnungdc.subject.gnd
GNDWertdc.subject.gnd
FacultyFakultät für Ingenieurwissenschaften, Informatik und Psychologieuulm.affiliationGeneral
InstitutionInstitut für Psychologie und Pädagogikuulm.affiliationSpecific
Grantor of degreeFakultät für Ingenieurwissenschaften, Informatik und Psychologieuulm.thesisGrantor
DCMI TypeTextuulm.typeDCMI
CategoryPublikationenuulm.category
Bibliographyuulmuulm.bibliographie


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record