Show simple item record

AuthorMelchers, Klaus G.dc.contributor.author
AuthorPetrig, Amadeusdc.contributor.author
AuthorBasch, Johannes M.dc.contributor.author
AuthorSauer, Juergendc.contributor.author
Date of accession2021-01-25T15:05:02Zdc.date.accessioned
Available in OPARU since2021-01-25T15:05:02Zdc.date.available
Date of first publication2021-01-12dc.date.issued
AbstractOrganizations increasingly use technology-mediated interviews. However, only limited research is available concerning the comparability of different interview media and most of the available studies stem from a time when technology-mediated interviews were less common than in the present time. In an experiment using simulated selection interviews, we compared traditional face-to-face (FTF) interviews with telephone and videoconference interviews to determine whether ratings of interviewees’ performance, their perceptions of the interview, or their strain and anxiety are affected by the type of interview. Before participating in the actual interview, participants had a more positive view of FTF interviews compared to technology-mediated interviews. However, fairness perceptions did not differ anymore after the interview. Furthermore, there were no differences between the three interview media concerning psychological and physiological indicators of strain or interview anxiety. Nevertheless, ratings of interviewees’ performance were lower in the technology-mediated interviews than in FTF interviews. Thus, differences between different interview media can still be found nowadays even though most applicants are much more familiar with technologymediated communication than in the past. The results show that organizations should take this into account and therefore avoid using different interview media when they interview different applicants for the same job opening.dc.description.abstract
Languageendc.language.iso
PublisherUniversität Ulmdc.publisher
LicenseCC BY 4.0 Internationaldc.rights
Link to license texthttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/dc.rights.uri
KeywordSelection interviewsdc.subject
KeywordTechnology-mediated interviewsdc.subject
KeywordInterview performancedc.subject
KeywordApplicant perceptionsdc.subject
KeywordInterview anxietydc.subject
Dewey Decimal GroupDDC 150 / Psychologydc.subject.ddc
LCSHEmployee selectiondc.subject.lcsh
LCSHEmployment interviewingdc.subject.lcsh
LCSHInterviewsdc.subject.lcsh
MeSHPersonnel selectiondc.subject.mesh
TitleA comparison of conventional and technology-mediated selection interviews with regard to interviewees’ performance, perceptions, strain, and anxietydc.title
Resource typeWissenschaftlicher Artikeldc.type
VersionpublishedVersiondc.description.version
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.18725/OPARU-34399dc.identifier.doi
URNhttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:289-oparu-34461-9dc.identifier.urn
GNDPersonalauswahldc.subject.gnd
GNDVorstellungsgesprächdc.subject.gnd
GNDInterviewdc.subject.gnd
FacultyFakultät für Ingenieurwissenschaften, Informatik und Psychologieuulm.affiliationGeneral
InstitutionInstitut für Psychologie und Pädagogikuulm.affiliationSpecific
Peer reviewjauulm.peerReview
DCMI TypeTextuulm.typeDCMI
CategoryPublikationenuulm.category
In cooperation withMIGROS Zürichuulm.cooperation
In cooperation withAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburguulm.cooperation
DOI of original publication10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603632dc.relation1.doi
Source - Title of sourceFrontiers in Psychologysource.title
Source - Place of publicationFrontiers Mediasource.publisher
Source - Volume11source.volume
Source - Year2021source.year
Source - Article number603632source.articleNumber
Source - eISSN1664-1078source.identifier.eissn
Bibliographyuulmuulm.bibliographie


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record